Sunday, January 29, 2006

The Military-Industrial Complex Revisited

Living in a society that has for my entire life surrounded me with war, rhetoric and symbols of war, threats of war, real war, and on and on, I regularly think about how we might change this course.

Recently I was reminded of President Eisenhower's Farewell Address of January 19, 1961. So, I went back to read it. It is a strikingly prescient speech from a President who frequently seemed so milquetoasty and just perhaps a bit slow, though as I write this I remember that he was a President who had extensive in person contact with war.

Here are the paragraphs most focused on our war state:

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known of any of my predecessors in peacetime, or, indeed, by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States cooperations -- corporations.

Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.


The complete speech (its actually quite short) is here

February 4, 2006: Today I discovered that back on December 10, 2004 I wrote about rediscovering the same Eisenhower speech to much the same point.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Czar GWB, NSA, and Hollywood

While I have stayed away from making comments about the new American Czar GWB's latest moves into the new imperium cum 1984, a chance bit of TV reinforced the seriousness of his maneuvers. It is easy to get lost in the legal babble and the point-counter point of our political culture. It is easy to loose track of what this is really all about - a comprehensive government oversight of every aspect of our lives. Ten years ago, we actually wrote letters and spoke to people face-to-face. Today, for many Americans, the web is the environment in which all communications moves. Now even the telephone is being Skyped away to the land of internet protocols.

So, back to this chance bit of TV:

Sunday night we watched "Enemy of the State", a 1998 thriller starring Will Smith, Gene Hackman and Jon Voight. This pre-9/11 movie stars the NSA with all of its surveillance tools fully deployed to track down and kill Will Smith. Though this is a very enjoyable thriller, the most frightening part of watching the movie is knowing that Czar GWB could actually literally be looking and listening just as the NSA devil-incarnate Thomas Reynolds (Jon Voight) does.

Now if you are still not persuaded that the government can really track us with its spy machinery take a look a this photo of my house in Cambridge:


Those little white forms on the deck are vinyl chairs and tables, just to add some scale.

Or, here is a tennis game at Hoyt Field a few hundred yards from my house:



If we can access these images through Google from publicly available sources, it is very easy to imagine that the NSA can see faces from space and certainly listen in on any and all conversations and emails. This Czar GWB stuff is serious.

For those who enjoy coincidences, during the movie, it is revealed that the chief bad guy, Thomas Reynolds (played by Jon Voight), was born on "9/11/1941".